As a former Williams College political science professor, I got
nostalgic this week as I read how student protesters secured the cancellation
of a speech by conservative author, Suzanne Venker. Her announced topic, “One
Step Forward, Ten Steps Back: Why Feminism Fails” inspired a cacophony of
on-line hostility which caused a student organizer, Zach Wood, to share with her
that Williams College “has never experienced this kind of resistance” to a
campus speaker.
According to Wood, at least one student labeled Venker as
a “misogynistic, white supremacist men’s rights activist” whose anticipated
presence was causing “actual mental, social, psychological, and physical harm
to students.”
What surprised me the most was Wood’s impression that this
sort of bizarre, over-the-top, anti-conservative hysteria was unprecedented at
Williams College.
As I shared in a recent interview with Jennifer Kabbany, the editor of The College Fix, I witnessed the considerable hostility of Williams College
students, faculty and administrators to conservative ideas first-hand when it
was directed against me while I taught on the campus from 1986 to 1989. At the
time, I was one of only three registered Republicans on the faculty. My status
as a registered Republican became public knowledge when I decided to help out
the local party officials by running for a state representative seat in the
area. Although I was not expected to win, party officials convinced me that my
appearance on the ballot would help
keep one of Gov. Michael Dukakis’s top allies, Rep. Sherwood Guernsey, from
working out-of-state to support the governor’s 1988 presidential campaign.
Within a couple of months, the female students were boycotting nearly all my classes and at least one member of the campus black student organization was denouncing me as a racist. In the spring of 1989, my department chair informed me that I would not be allowed to continue on my tenure-track career path. He told me that this genuinely unprecedented decision was due to the poor quality of my research. Ironically, a few months later, I won a prestigious national award from the American Political Science Association for having recently completed the best doctoral dissertation in the nation in my field. In protest, I resigned from Williams that summer rather than accept an additional year of employment.
Within a couple of months, the female students were boycotting nearly all my classes and at least one member of the campus black student organization was denouncing me as a racist. In the spring of 1989, my department chair informed me that I would not be allowed to continue on my tenure-track career path. He told me that this genuinely unprecedented decision was due to the poor quality of my research. Ironically, a few months later, I won a prestigious national award from the American Political Science Association for having recently completed the best doctoral dissertation in the nation in my field. In protest, I resigned from Williams that summer rather than accept an additional year of employment.
Students and faculty at Williams
College figured out I was a
Republican when I ran for a
state representative position
in Massachusetts.
|
Much like Suzanne Venker, I was eager to provide a common
sense critique of feminism coupled with a practical understanding that most, if
not all, of my students would go on to marry and have children. The class, a
surprisingly even mix of young men and women, clearly enjoyed the course. It
ended up impacting my own decisions about how to find a suitable wife.
You can sample Venker’s recommendations for living happily
ever after by reading the text of her planned speech. It is now available on
the Fox News Opinion website. The gist
of her message is that feminism fails “...because
it denies the existence of biology and teaches that equality means sameness,
which is a losing proposition when it comes to planning a life—particularly if
that life includes marriage and family.”
As I consider what happened to Venker, I am most interested in understanding why the organizers of this student-run, alumni-funded speaking series would give in to threats of violence. I think part of the problem is that the students who established the Uncomfortable Learning Speaker Series are so isolated that they do not have a faculty adviser.
While I was at William College, I helped the conservative
students create their own radio and television shows. I remember that later on some
administration officials threatened the conservative students who were seeking
to establish an alternative newspaper that would print their articles and
opinion pieces. I remember advising them to persist even if they were kicked
out. Those young conservatives won that fight. I would have counseled student
organizers like Zach Wood to go ahead with their event even if their fellow
students threatened to behead the participants.
John C. Drew, Ph.D. is an award-winning political scientist.
No comments:
Post a Comment