I think pundits are starting to catch on that President Obama is crashing and burning. This predictable "Obama Fail" can be traced to his limited experience as a chief executive, his non-experience in the business world, and his utter cluelessness on military matters. How else can we explain his inability to push through his political agenda regarding credit card and home mortgage reforms despite his big Democrat majority in Congress?
Given these circumstances, I think Republicans would be wise to think through how they can help swing voters who voted for Obama in 2008 feel comfortable voting against Obama in 2012.
The problem, in my view, is some voters will be afraid to vote against Obama because they feel it sends a negative message that an African-American cannot be a successful President. In addition, they may be embarrassed to admit that they were wrong about Obama's character, ideology, and inexperience. Here are my initial ideas for helping them feel okay with a one-term Obama administration.
First, I think the most gentle approach would be to erase the stigma of being a one-term President. For example, we can suggest there is no shame in being a one-term President, or any obvious honor in being a two-term President.
Second, we can help swing voters save face by suggesting - truthfully - that they did not have full knowledge of Obama’s ties to folks like Gov. Blagojevich or Sen. Burris or Rev. Wright when they made their initial choice. After all, Obama's campaign team and the liberal media did a great job of covering up his flaws. For example, they covered up his difficulty in speaking without the help of a teleprompter. They pretended that Obama's links to Bill Ayers, Rev. Wright, and members of the U.S. Communist party would not impact his policy leadership.
Third, we can also suggest that Obama deserves to be replaced because he did not live up to his own campaign promises regarding setting high standards. Who knew that he would fight so hard to have a tax cheat like Sen. Tom Daschle on is staff, or that he would prove to be so spinless in hiring lobbyists?
Finally, the best argument - in my view - is to say that we have a new anti-socialist Republican party which has arisen in reaction to his extreme and dangerous policy preferences. These preferences have been revealed to the public now that he has been forced to finally start making decisions. Ultimately, swing voters need to make a decision that Obama's not-so-secret-any-more Marxist socialist ideology isn't working and that they strongly reject the leadership of the new, international, Democrat Socialist party.
John C. Drew, Ph.D. is an award-winning political scientist who is featured in Trevor Loudon's documentary, The Enemies Within.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Most Popular Posts
-
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Democrat candidate for Congress. We don't need farmers, we have grocery stores. Nothing is built in Ame...
-
WILLIAMSTOWN, MA - Academics offended by the extremism of Chad M. Topaz , a woke Williams College math professor, have organized a peti...
-
Jack Cashill voices the pain of those of us who are doing the journalistic work we once thought was the sole responsibility of CBS’s 60 Mi...
-
Seyi Olaose ’22 confronting white student representatives during a College Council meeting at Williams College on April 9, 2019. ...
-
I was going through some old photos and found this picture of a much younger John Drew graduating from Occidental College back on June 9, 1...
2 comments:
Wow, excellent ideas. Do you really think people in general are catching on? I don't even dare to hope for that yet.
Excellent post! I always believed that many swing voters would be embarrassed that they were suckered into the whole Hope and Change nonsense. I do believe that we are entering the first stage of Obama rejection (the realiztion that there is no magic here). The next phase will be the embarassment phase where, these people won't want to admit that they were suckered. Your post lays out some good ideas on how to deal with it.
Post a Comment